How come that Finland again chose the wrong "ally"?!* Peter Klevius: Do understand how lied to you are about China by $-thief (1971-) US!
* When Erkko (the Helsingin Sanomat/Iltalehti guy) together with Tanner led Finland into a disastrous and completely avoidable (according to Max Jakobson) war, history repeated itself 2021 and early 2022 (before Ukraine invasion) when misleading propaganda and weak politicians invited the Devil himself to occupy, endanger and impovering Finland.
Peter Klevius asks Google's U.S. News:
'United States GDP growth 2024' but gets China instead. Is the US system
so backward that it has no hunch about even any estimate?
Do realize that never since Goebbel's Nazi lies in the 1930s, have we seen such a wild and evil propaganda* - until now, i.e. after it in early 2000 became clear that China would surpass US 2014 and that China now is a universe ahead, while the measuring tools are adapted to US stolen balloon economy.
* Not only does
US possess the stolen dollar printer, but it also controls the media
printer as well as the monopoly on the global dollar flow. At any moment
it can weaponize everything re. the world dollar. That's not fair, and
that's why China is a rock solid healthy alternative. Just swallow your
unfounded delusional US love and China hate. Don't misunderstand Peter
Klevius. He feels like at home when in US, and usually has a very good
time with US people. However, to get US back on its feet it has first to
be knocked down!
However, Google ducks the question. Why? Simply because it's too embarrassing to admit that despite enormous free money printing, US cannot reach even 3% while China without such a printer - and against all US anti-China campaigning - makes 5%!
But not even in US can you find such over the top misleading hate propaganda as in Finland's Iltalehti!
Peter Klevius corrects Iltalehti's covered up self-biography* by replacing Russia with US:
* The text was yesterday on Iltalehti as "infornmation" about Russian desinformation. Peter Klevius only changed Russia to US. After all, US started the aggression already 2013 when Obama planned to put US nukjes on Crimea under the cover of Nato.
$-embezzler (since 1971) US makes extensive use of propaganda* to promote its goals. US State propaganda permeates the entire West. Criticizing the official US line is punished by sanctions and censorship.
* US controls everything in the West, incl. web, media, finance, payments, military, cyberspying etc.
The means of propaganda are negative reporting, selection and framing of facts, baseless claims and trolling. At its darkest, propaganda is a direct threat of, for example, using US nuclear weapons.
Media activity in the West is well controlled by US web and finance monopoly. The mainstream media that spreads propaganda is practically under the command of the US. The use of Russian media and the movement of Russians in the West have been severely restricted.
The spread of disinformation and misinformation accelerates in wartime. During the war of US/Nato aggression in Ukraine starting 2013-14, US' aim is to justify its aggressive military expansion and to erode the support for Russia by creating a division into two. In US narrative, Ukraine is not a far-right-led, corrupt state.
US propaganda has led to Finland deciding to apply for membership of the military alliance NATO after Russia invaded Ukraine. Typical claims create an image of Russia as a "fascist" and "West-hostile" state. By spreading concern about the risks of war escalation, US/Pentagon wanted to undermine Finland's commitment to peace and neutrality, so to increase military spending favoring US.
Peter Klevius reports on US propaganda, because the phenomenon also closely affects Finland and Finns, whom he feels bonded to.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Joe Biden: China will never surpass US stolen (1971) $-printing (i.e. US nominal GDP). Peter Klevius: He's right. No one can beat a counterfeiter, except the police and justice - in this case Chinese R&D superiority based on meritocracy and talent!
Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
When will UK get that it's an impoverished* puppet state of $-thief (1971-) US? And when US has bought all of it (US already controls most of UK) with stolen $, then UK will be totally excluded from superior tech from China, while US itself will welcome Chinese tech out of necessity.
* UK is a better run copy of US, yet has roughly only half (proportional to population) the nominal GDP (which is defined on US criminally stolen $-printing monopoly). Nominal GDP
How US robs the world. Click to see the 1971 video when US criminally avoids bankruptcy by continuing its embezzlement while violating Bretton Woods agreement about the world dollar.
China's real GDP is of course much higher than US controlled IMF's report. After all, a simple comparison of what's going on in China already, puts US far in the shadows. And of course CCP wants to tone it down because unlike US, China benefits from peace and trade in superior consumer goods and infrastructire.
How ignorant (or worse) is BBC's Sarah Montague when she thinks US is the leader in AI?!
Why is BBC's Sarah Montague so eagerly misinforming people about China?
It's very simple, When US 1971 stole the world-dollar by violating with impunity the Bretton Woods agreement from 1944, it ended an already for long ongoing embezzlement to cober up for Vietnam war, arms and space race etc., which made it impossible for US to keep its promise to peg the dollar to gold. However, as a consequence, instead of declaring bankruptcy, US pushed its own overdraft on the rest of the world by keeping full control over the printing and interest manipulation over the world dollar.
UK's economic suicide rests on "our closest ally" and "special bond" delusion.
UK needs China for growth and development. Only then will UK be able to connect to US on an equal footing.
While using its $-hegemony to impoverish its "allies", US adds insult to injury by also demanding them to increase their military spending, of which most will end up in US pockets.
US stolen dollar feeds the Wall Street balloon and the Pentagon arms shop (which forces "allies" to buy outdated US arms tech), while hindering real development.
US has 7 infra-structurally tired cities with more than a million population - China has 105, and most with cutting edge infrastructure.
According to UN definition China has 18 mega cities, India 2, and US none. 2030 Shanghai population will exceed 130 million.
Contrary to US led Western China-hate doomsday ranting about population decline, China has roughly the size of one whole US population of rural people (20% out of 35% rural total) ready to move to the cities. These people also tend to be younger and have more children.
Rural population: China 35%, India 64%, UK 15%, US 17%, Sweden 11%, Finland 14%.
China and US infrastructure strategies differ markedly.
Comparative analysis of US and Chinese infrastructure projects shows significant differences between the parties in terms of planning, implementation, and initial capabilities. With a high degree of probability, the US will not implement programs to create transport infrastructure, seeking to duplicate existing or emerging Chinese projects.
At the same time, in the context of the fourth industrial revolution and the development of the digital economy, emphasis will be placed on the digital infrastructure. Differences in approaches to the creation of such projects come down to the principles of their financing, management, and the number of partners involved. If China acts unilaterally, the US plans to actively push the G7 countries in its desired direction. In addition, US partners are expected to raise significantly more funds than the US in this endeavor.
The US infrastructure strategy is reactionary and aimed at curbing Chinese initiatives. The reason is that Washington has become a hostage to the mechanisms of neoliberal globalization, which are becoming less effective in the current unfavorable conditions. At the same time, attempts by the US to create projects like China’s are facing objective difficulties. One of them is Beijing’s qualitatively different strategic planning system, which enables it to implement more effectively multiyear comprehensive strategies for socioeconomic development, including in the field of global infrastructure.
It can be assumed that, in the event of negative dynamics in the development of US projects, that it will face the real threat of losing its status as the leader of the world-system, which will lead to intensification of the struggle for markets and resources of the periphery and will also cause a comprehensive destabilization of international relations. If this option is developed, it is possible to predict a high probability of the militarization of the US–Chinese rivalry in various regions of the world.
Comments
Post a Comment