University of Oxford's blatant charlatanism on human evolution could have been avoided by checking Peter Klevius anthropology!
According to Peter Klevius (1992, 2012), there was a split between small-bodied tropical Homo sapiens and those who went north and got cold adapted and big. However, they all emerged in the SE Asian volatile archipelago, and are exactly similar - except for size. So the small size of tropical Homo sapiens was actually the original form but has been mostly deleted by genocide and rape. However, these photographed ones are very recent and "disturb" PC views (e.g. in Australia). Peter Klevius wrote: Peter Klevius: Why was the most important evolutionary fossil, 106 cm Homo floresiensis woman from SE Asia, ridiculed and pathologized, while random ape bones of the same size female ape from NE Africa was titled "the marvellous Lucy"?! According to Peter Klevius, the cradle of humans (like of most s.c. "African animals") was the volatile tropical SE Asian archipelago. Small Homos spread during low sea level via mainland tropics, while others got bigger in ...