Peter Klevius Finland-Swedish anthropology

Posts

Peter Klevius global finance analysis for dumb (or worse -corrupt) Finnish politicians: $-freeloader (since 1971) US needs urgent help against its selfinflicted financial cancer!

October 03, 2023

$-freeloader (since 1971) US is now naked - because of China's R&D success - and has become a dangerous desperado and disinformer, trying to cover its financial crimes by corrupting its "allies". The only way out is to quell the cancer at its root - even if it hurts! And the metastasis (like e.g. Finland etc.) will feel the pain - but possibly avoiding a total catastrophe. Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa . Read Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria . Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct . No one should be surprised that a young country that had as its pare...

Peter Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it) to Jenni Hermoso - and all the world's women: Patriarchal ape behavior is history!

August 27, 2023

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa . Read Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria . Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct . Evolutionary heterosexual attraction (HSA) is biological - as are its targets, biological women - but basic (negative) Human Rights are civilized and human! Outdated cultural pushing (rapetivism and sex segregation/apartheid) ape behavior against the best player (together with Aitana Bonmatí) in the World Cup 2023. Luis Rubiales may well have had no sexist intentions but this doesn't remove the sexist cultural heritage under which he acted in an emoti...

Peter Klevius 'existencecentrism' (1992:21-22, ISBN 9173288411) vs 'existentialism'. Sören Kierkegaard: 'Human reason has boundaries'. Peter Klevius: There cannot be any boundaries because our existencecentrism excludes us from defining one. A boundary implies something outside it. However, our existencecentrism gives us no access outside our mind. This means existentialists conflate their "boundary" with a semantic construction inside their mind. Jean-Paul Sartre opposed defining human beings as primarily rational, and asserted that people make decisions based on subjective meaning rather than pure rationality. Peter Klevius: Humans can only be rational because they are strapped to the content of their mind. Irrationality and subjectivity only exist between human minds.

China is the best for consumers. That’s why $-freeloader (1971-) US wants to block it so to prolong its stolen $-hegemony. China has no reason to harm its trade – US has! Google, Facebook etc. are now directly connected to US military and spy organizations – I.e what US wrongly accuses Tik Tok for. Forget everything you’ve heard about China through US controlled/influenced media (incl. BBC which now, before Tianamen 35 anniversary, sends senseless anti-China hate rant in 10 acts). Sadly, it’s almost impossible to get balanced info. And although this (deliberately) is on Google – it has been made almost invisible! Simply by declaring what Klaus Schwab calls “a model country” a “threat”, US dictates its “allies” to do the same – in the face of tho people who want Chinese tech. Peter Klevius wonders whether China really would have been better off with the "democracy" protesters in China 1989 asked for, than the meritocratic high tech and on controlled capitalism resting post-Mao China we see today? And if so, then how would $-embezzler (1971-) US have reacted when "undemocratic"* China is already seen as a "threat", US stolen $-hegemony? * According to research Chinese meritocracy reaches the will of the people better than US "democracy"!

China is the best for consumers. That’s why $-freeloader (1971-) US wants to block it so to prolong its stolen $-hegemony. China has no reason to harm its trade – US has! Google, Facebook etc. are now directly connected to US military and spy organizations – I.e what US wrongly accuses Tik Tok for. Forget everything you’ve heard about China through US controlled/influenced media (incl. BBC which now, before Tianamen 35 anniversary, sends senseless anti-China hate rant in 10 acts). Sadly, it’s almost impossible to get balanced info. And although this (deliberately) is on Google – it has been made almost invisible! Simply by declaring what Klaus Schwab calls “a model country” a “threat”, US dictates its “allies” to do the same – in the face of tho people who want Chinese tech. Peter Klevius wonders whether China really would have been better off with the "democracy" protesters in China 1989 asked for, than the meritocratic high tech and on controlled capitalism resting post-Mao China we see today? And if so, then how would $-embezzler (1971-) US have reacted when "undemocratic"* China is already seen as a "threat", US stolen $-hegemony? * According to research Chinese meritocracy reaches the will of the people better than US "democracy"!

Trying to understand the polarizing and warmongering without incl. the consequences of US 1971 $-theft - which are now coming home to roost because of China's superior R&D - is an equation without an x. From a pro-war politician's mouth always comes a copy of the original in US. US inflamed the existing racial tensions in Ukraine for the purpose of getting US nukes and US anti-nuke missiles on Russia's border, so to protect itself in its planned war against China - because only by creating a similar chaos as in WW2 on the Eurasian continent would US be able to continue its stolen dollar hegemony.

From US "exorbitant dollar privilege" (financial abuse of vulnerable countries - but the dollar still connected to gold) 1944-, to US financial fraud 1971- (US self-indulgent disconnection of the dollar value from gold after having spent too much on wars and space race etc.). US' "China threat" demonizing is now code for US own threat, i.e. US masking its own desperation when losing its 1971- stolen dollar hegemony because of China's growing high tech superiority. How many understand this simple truth - and how many blink it?! Before 1971 there was only one world-dollar (since Bretton Woods 1944). After the "Nixon chock" 1971 there were two: One for US dictated by US (Feds), and an other for the rest of the world, also dictated by US. And the difference was that the US-dollar made it possible for US to prosper despite trade deficit, because the rest of the world has paid the difference. Also do recognize that Roosewelt's similar move 1933 happened before the Bretton Woods agreement.

Forget about Nature! Here you get your by far most qualified and least biased (not steered by peer "reviews" or PC editors, but by super high IQ not corrupted by religion, politics or money) scientific overall understanding of evolution (1981), human evolution (1992-), consciousness (1992-94) and AI (1979-), and Human Rights (1979- incl. sex segregation). In his topics of scientific interest Peter Klevius has got highest possible recommendations from world leading professors on the topics. And no, the author has never been caught with mental problems, abuse or criminality, and has successfully fostered all of his children. So why presenting himself like this?! Simply because his best services to science can't get properly through via other media, and here it's often dismissed as "just a blogger's opinion" - which is quite rich when considering much peer reviewed nonsense PC "science" allowed on Nature! And non-scientific posts here of course utilize the same brain power.

Why is a meritocratic, capitalism and trade supporting, Chinese president, with more than 2/3 approval rating, called a "dictator", while a wild capitalism and protectionism and anti-China sanctions and smearing supporting, militaristic warmongering US president with 1/3 of indirect votes on electors who were chosing among candidates chosen by the big money, is called "democratic"?! It seems that "Christian democracy" is a similarly empty but magic wording as is "the Atheist Communist dictatorship".

Atheist (like the overwhelming majority of Brits) Peter Klevius (whose genetist declared him an Anglo-Saxon) to figurehead King (but not at all absolute monarch) Charles 3: Please celebrate the year 1948 when you and the Universal Human Rights Declaration were born, by asking for forgivness for all the atrocities England has done on the British Isles and around the world - especially the less talked about, e.g. like the opium wars, and how England was an accomplice to the islamic slave trade which is the worst ideologically based crime against humanity ever. Also please mention all the Communists and other people who together constituted probably more than the Jews in the same Holocaust but whose suffering and death is sadly not talked about at all. And do apologize for the victims of the British horrifying firebombings against civilians in the end of World War 2. And why not also apologize for stealing the Chagos Island from the Chagossians, then deporting them from their own land, and renting it out as a military base for US! Also don't forget evil British meddling and militarism consuming from foreign aid aid and starving and freezing Brits. And don't forget to criticize BBC which has no problem with the invitation of the islamofascist muslim terrorism supporting Saudi dictator family (a real absolute kingdom which, unlike China, doesn't accept Human Rights) but never stops its unfounded racist Sinophobic spitting on China and its extremely balanced Hong Kong policy against seditious British backed terrorism against the democratic "one nation two systems" incl. the attacks against Hong Kong governmental and parliamentarian buildings even worse than the Capitol demonstration in US which BBC paints in exactly the opposite way. Or UK's senseless "genocide" against muslims accusation against China despite the world's largest muslim organization OIC praised China for its good treatment of muslims in Xinjiang and elsewhere. Wheras BBC cherry picked jihadist stories and some random incidents not approved by the Chinese government, OIC sent a big delegation to inspect the allegations and talked with the non-jihadi muslim community! Charles! Indigenous voices - e.g. like the Chagossians - held crucial messages about preservation of the land, respecting community and shared values, resolving conflict, and recognizing and making good on past iniquities, right! Don't worry about demonstrations and stupidities. And if you're curious about the biggest scientific questions, welcome to my blogs - however, Google may ask you to sign in because truth and Human Rights are "sensitive"! Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. And read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct. And much more!