Posts

Showing posts from November, 2024

Peter Klevius: 2013, against US promise 1996, Obama opened up for US nukes on Crimea, which caused Russia's annexation 2014 after a majority of Crimeans asked for it. Today $-freeloader (since 1971) US politics is all about China's tech superiority.

Image
A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa .  Read Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria . Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct .  US compensated for its tech inferiority against Japan with stolen $ and tariffs.  1982 Honda was the world leader in motorbikes when "American icon"* H-D went bankrupt but was rescued by the US government! Today 12 times bigger China is the undisputed* tech le

Peter Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it): US women were smarter than Kamala Harris! A vagina without a brain isn't enough.

Image
Peter Klevius analysis of the problem with sex segregation: Biological/physical heterosexual attraction* as a career tool may be used by some less capable women to outperform more capable ones. * The evolutionary forces that resulted in heterosexual reproduction is based on heterosexual attraction (long before we got a brain and culture such as e.g. sex segregation) which means physical - not "romantic" as Google tries to spin it. The opposite to heterosexual is homosexual which is also only physically defined. Everyone, no matter of sex or lack thereof, can have "romantic" relations.     Sperms have no brains but have heterosexual attraction to the egg - and we men are our sperms "sex slaves". Since Peter Klevius reached puberty (and realized he was biologically attracted to women) he has repeated the question 'why is the more attractive sex so busy trying to make itself more attractive'? And although Peter Klevius possess a well func