Peter Klevius Finland-Swedish anthropology

* In the context of international crimes, falsehoods — ranging from selective reporting of facts, deliberate mischaracterization of events and adversaries, or even plain fabrication and lies — constitute a breeding ground in which incitement to support the committing of violence (i.e. war) can thrive. While disseminating such falsehoods does not constitute a direct call to commit physical violence, it nevertheless sows the seeds for mass atrocities. The outer limits of International Criminal Law (ICL) — defined by the principle of culpability — depends on whether campaigns of disinformation in the context of mass atrocities could ever give rise to individual responsibility. On the basis of the Fritzsche, Gvero and Mbarushimana cases, liability for disseminating disinformation might in principle be engaged before, during and even after the commission of such crimes. Concerns about the role of media may also pose the question whether media or their personnel may be liable f...

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa .  Read Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria . Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct .  US compensated for its tech inferiority against Japan with stolen $ and tariffs.  1982 Honda was the world leader in motorbikes when "American icon"* H-D went bankrupt but was rescued by the US government! Today 12 times bigger China is the undisputed* tech le...

Peter Klevius analysis of the problem with sex segregation: Biological/physical heterosexual attraction* as a career tool may be used by some less capable women to outperform more capable ones. * The evolutionary forces that resulted in heterosexual reproduction is based on heterosexual attraction (long before we got a brain and culture such as e.g. sex segregation) which means physical - not "romantic" as Google tries to spin it. The opposite to heterosexual is homosexual which is also only physically defined. Everyone, no matter of sex or lack thereof, can have "romantic" relations.     Sperms have no brains but have heterosexual attraction to the egg - and we men are our sperms "sex slaves". Since Peter Klevius reached puberty (and realized he was biologically attracted to women) he has repeated the question 'why is the more attractive sex so busy trying to make itself more attractive'? And although Peter Klevius possess a well func...